Bluesky is banning access to its app for people from Mississippi following a new drastic age verification law:
Unfortunately, Bluesky is unavailable in Mississippi right now, due to a new state law that requires age verification for all users. While intended for child safety, we think this law poses broader challenges & creates significant barriers that limit free speech & harm smaller platforms like ours.
Some thoughts:
Bluesky PBC is fully onboard now with viewing clients as access points to the network, and as the point where regulation happens. See also their new ToS, which also makes it clear that this is only for their client
The messaging from PBC is quite different on this case versus how they handled OSA. Their communication on OSA did not mention at all at their gating system could be bypassed. For Mississippi regulation they explicitly explain it however:"This decision applies only to the Bluesky app, which is one service built on the AT Protocol. Other apps and services may choose to respond differently. We believe this flexibility is one of the strengths of decentralized systems—different providers can make decisions that align with their values and capabilities, especially during periods of regulatory uncertainty. We remain committed to building a protocol that enables openness and choice."
Having alternate clients that can access the network only matters when people actually use other clients. So far, PBC has given users very little reason to use other clients, as the main client is very well developed by professionals, making it hard for single volunteer devs to keep up. Unclear if or how that dynamic will change moving forward.
The fediverse keeps willfully misunderstanding how atproto works, nor does it show any curiosity or interest in learning about it.
Mastodon is particularly vulnerable, with a ceo who is not interested in complying with regulation. There is this assumption that the fediverse is so decentralised that regulators will somehow ignore fediverse servers.
My main concern is for mastodon. ceo eugen rochko is pretty explicit that he does not care, but he seems not to realise he is actually vulnerable on two points:
he operates a subsidiary organisation within the US (for fundraising), making his org within easy reach of us law enforcement
he maintains the most popular apps for the entire fediverse network, the 'official' mastodon apps. these are distributed on ios and android. The app stores mainly dont follow state-by-state law, instead conservatively applying laws to the entire country. the easiest way for mississippi to force mastodon.social to comply with their regulation is simply to tell apple and google to get the mastodon apps of the app store.